Archive for the ‘elections’ Category

Dissent is the mother of? (Ask Nader)

Thursday, February 28th, 2008

I used Nader’s phrasing in a recent post. A little web checking points to auditory and conceptual confusion among half the media covering his Presidential bid. Some news sites reported ‘assent’ others ‘ascent’. Do a google search.

Did any member of the press ask Nader which he meant? (I assumed the former, myself.) They were probably too sure about what they heard and what they understood.

I enjoy polysemy, and find that both terms actually work. What did you hear? assent? ascent? a scent? a cent?

Everproud

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

Let’s think for a moment. Have there been any moments in your life when you have felt shame or disappointment at your/our country, or in reaction to the history of our country? is blind pride in the nation something to be praised, or is it a fatal flaw?

Surely, in our history we as a people have committed grave errors, and errors and crimes have been committed in our name, even when without our consent (and sometimes without sufficient protest).

Our public servants, our brave citizen-soldiers pledge their oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. The Constitution is not “my country right or wrong” - the Constitution, and the processes and balance of structures it defines (not enshrines) are founded in values. They are an expression of values - they contest with each other to guard against corruption and to establish firm foundation for the rule of law. Extension and upholding of the rule of law is the deeper question of our global civilization.

Dissent, it is said, is the mother of assent.

We must retain the freedom to criticize our government. These freedoms are enshrined in the founding documents of our nation. This is the deeper love I have for my nation, my people. This is what our soldiers defend, This is the love our people must share with the peoples of the Earth.

Databases vs. Documents… Diebold Decides?

Friday, February 15th, 2008

Sascha Meinrath has an interesting account of the Voter experience in Maryland. He asks a very important question: since when do databases trump official documents?

“Washington is the party of money.”

Thursday, February 7th, 2008

This was David Cay Johnston’s closing statement when interviewed on Bill Moyers’ Journal in January, 2008. David Cay Johnston is an investigative reporter for the New York Times and author of Free Lunch. Listening to this interview segment for the second time, I reflected upon the discipline of community informatics and the practice of civic entrepreneurship (as well as new modes of philanthropy).

If social justice is the scale with which we are to measure our effectiveness and our national character, we must not blind nor bind ourselves in a hyper-localism amounting to a head-in-the-sand response to the many policy shenanigans now written out as the law-of-the-land, or passed over - de facto - in the exercise in neglect by those who are entrusted with enforcement of the law.

The extent to which Washington has been the party of money, irrespective of the party nominally in charge, has led to a long-standing regime of laws (and enforcement) at odds with principles of sound governance. This scenario has given many a strong motivation to dismantle government. We have long been distracted by conflicts over the legitimacy of entitlement programs, while we have overlooked the institutionalization of rampant profiteering at the expense of the people and our long term interests.

As citizens, community informaticists, civic and social entrepreneurs and philanthropists, what is our response to the challenge of restoring justice and good governance to the nation?

Yes, we can. We will. Si, se puede!

Sunday, February 3rd, 2008